We conducted a series of blocked regression analyses to evaluate whether beliefs about STIs and promiscuity were related to social distance ratings for each of the four relationship orientation targets. Scores for both religious and political affiliation were entered in Step 1 and STI ratings and promiscuity ratings were entered in Step 2 as the independent variables. Religious and political beliefs did not significantly predict social distance ratings for monogamous targets (ps > 0.05). Perceptions about the likelihood of having an STI and beliefs about promiscuity were also not significant for predicting social distance for monogamous targets (ps > 0.05). The model incorporating religious and political affiliation was significant for targets in open [F(4,626) = 7.13, p = 0.001], polyamorous [F(4,628) = , p < 0.001], and swinger [F(4,622) = 9.84, p < 0.001] relationships. Ratings of the likelihood of having an STI significantly predicted social distance for targets in open relationships [? = 0.12, t(6,626) = 2.78, p = 0.006] and accounted for 1.17% of the overall variance. The overall variance explained for targets in open relationships was R 2 = 0.07. For targets in polyamorous relationships, ratings of likelihood of having an STI significantly predicted social distance [? = 0.26, t(6,628) = 5.74, p < 0.001] and accounted for 4.62% of the overall variance. The overall variance explained for targets in polyamorous relationships was R 2 = 0.13. For targets in swinging relationships, ratings of likelihood of having an STI also significantly predicted social distance [? = 0.25, t(6,622) = 6.14, p < 0.001] and accounted for 5.57% of the overall variance. The overall variance explained for individuals in swinging relationships was R 2 = 0.09. In all cases, beliefs about STIs predicted social distance for CNM targets (polyamorous, open and swinging individuals), but beliefs about promiscuity did not.
Discussion
What it is of your latest lookup was in fact threefold. First, in keeping with past research (Conley mais aussi al., 2013) we found to reproduce the newest halo effect of monogamy as compared to about three different varieties of consensually low-monogamous (CNM) relationship. Consistent with this earliest mission, we discovered that every someone, irrespective of the matchmaking positioning, rated monogamous those with lower societal point, especially if the CNM groups was in fact folded with her. That it effect and came up whenever managing getting political and you can religious association. This can be relative to prior browse one demonstrates CNM individuals are essentially imagined less surely than just monogamous anyone (Conley et al., 2013; Moors ainsi que al., 2013).
This may be also possible regarding various other CNM relationships
2nd, we wanted to determine the way the halo feeling refers to certain CNM matchmaking personality and if thinking about promiscuity together with likelihood of obtaining a keen STI was basically related to wanted public length.ادامه خواندن