Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Meters. G., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Evolution and you will Peoples Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.
Cross-sectional data out-of intimacy, hobbies, and you can connection: Testing the brand new presumptions of one’s triangular idea from love
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The place off accessory within the person mating. Review of Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, Good. (2002). Sites paradox reviewed. Journal regarding Societal Affairs, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web sites contradiction: A personal technology one decreases social involvement and you may emotional really-getting? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.M., & Fields, J. M. (2001). Matter, time, and you can time of marriages and you may divorces. Most recent Populace Accounts, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Impact finest on the creating tough: Social reviews inside intimate matchmaking. Journal off Identity and Public Psychology, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Record out-of Identification and you may Personal Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.ادامه خواندن