Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Meters. G., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Evolution and you will Peoples Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.
Cross-sectional data out-of intimacy, hobbies, and you can connection: Testing the brand new presumptions of one’s triangular idea from love
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The place off accessory within the person mating. Review of Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, Good. (2002). Sites paradox reviewed. Journal regarding Societal Affairs, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web sites contradiction: A personal technology one decreases social involvement and you may emotional really-getting? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.M., & Fields, J. M. (2001). Matter, time, and you can time of marriages and you may divorces. Most recent Populace Accounts, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Impact finest on the creating tough: Social reviews inside intimate matchmaking. Journal off Identity and Public Psychology, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Record out-of Identification and you may Personal Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to glamorous solutions: The newest changed therapy away from relationships maintenance. Progression and you can People Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential data of dispute and accord from inside the distressed and you may nondistressed marital lovers. Diary regarding Contacting and Scientific Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. An excellent., Eco-friendly, A good. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the web: What’s the larger destination? Record away from Social Facts, 58(1), 9–29.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). Some great benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and structure regarding pleasure in romantic relationships. Log out of Identity and Public Psychology, 70(1), 79–98.
Neff, L. An excellent., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-analysis intentions in the personal matchmaking: A model of internationally improvement and you may certain verification. In the P. Noller & J. An excellent. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding ents about examination of couple communications (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge School Drive.
Intrasexual vigilance: New implicit knowledge away from close datingmentor.org/escort/fairfield rivalry
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the customer-therapist bond through the contact away from accessory theory. Psychotherapy: Concept, Look, Behavior, Knowledge, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The fresh public keeping track of system: Enhanced sensitiveness in order to societal cues because the an adaptive a reaction to social difference. Into the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), This new societal outcast: Ostracism, public exception to this rule, rejection, and bullying (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Therapy Push.
Enter, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Internationally and you may specific relational models on experience of personal affairs. Record out of Personality and Personal Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An effective., Tran, S., ). Attachment and advice seeking inside personal relationships. Identity and Personal Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and specific accessory representations within the adulthood: Can there be a relationship?. Record Off Social And private Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A great. (2001)mitment and relationships restoration elements. From inside the J. Harvey & An effective. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate intimate relationships: Repairs and you will improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A beneficial. D. (2000). Projection in person impact certainly one of partners once the a purpose of the newest similarity within mutual knowledge. Identification And Public Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Ramifications of salience off extrinsic perks towards taste and you will enjoying. Journal regarding Identification and you may Public Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.